Scroll to explore
Competencies
Communication

Argumentation

Defend a position with evidence, logic, and respect for opposing views.

PremiseEvidenceConclusionCounter-argumentFallacyLogicDebateRefutationPersuasionThesisOpinion vs. argumentAd hominemPrinciple of charityReasoningRhetoricArgumentative structureCritical thinkingCognitive empathy
"

I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it.

— Evelyn Beatrice Hall (attributed to Voltaire)

Mastery progression

Emerging

States opinions without giving reasons. Confuses asserting with arguing. Struggles to hold a position when questioned.

Developing

Gives reasons for their opinions. Starts to use evidence but superficially. Can identify a counter-argument.

Proficient

Builds arguments with premise, evidence, and conclusion. Anticipates objections. Distinguishes opinion from argument.

Expert

Argues with logical rigor and empathy. Evaluates the strength of different arguments. Changes their position when faced with better evidence.

Zone of proximal development
Safe zone
  • Give a reason to justify their opinion
  • Identify whether someone is giving an opinion or stating a fact
  • Say whether they agree or disagree and why
Opportunity zone
  • Structure an argument with claim + evidence + explanation
  • Respond to a counter-argument without dismissing the other person
  • Identify common fallacies in a text or speech
  • Evaluate whether the evidence presented is sufficient and relevant
Future zone
  • Build an argument in favor of a position they disagree with
  • Moderate a debate ensuring argumentative quality from all participants
  • Design an argument evaluation framework for a complex topic

Questions that activate it

Tap a card to see the coaching guide

1/8?

What is your claim, and what evidence do you have to support it?

Tap to flip
1/8 Coaching guide

The foundational question of all argumentation. Separates opinion from evidence. If there is no evidence, it's a belief, not an argument.

Tap to return
2/8?

What would someone who thinks the opposite say?

Tap to flip
2/8 Coaching guide

Trains cognitive empathy and strengthens the argument. If you can anticipate the objection, you can address it in advance.

Tap to return
3/8?

Does that evidence prove what you're saying, or could it prove something else?

Tap to flip
3/8 Coaching guide

Works on the distinction between correlation and causation. Avoids logical leaps that weaken the argument.

Tap to return
4/8?

What would have to happen for you to change your mind?

Tap to flip
4/8 Coaching guide

Measures intellectual openness. If nothing could change the opinion, it's not an argument — it's a dogma.

Tap to return
5/8?

Does your argument hold in all cases or only in this one?

Tap to flip
5/8 Coaching guide

Detects excessive generalizations. Helps narrow the claim to make it more solid.

Tap to return
6/8?

Are you attacking the idea or the person who said it?

Tap to flip
6/8 Coaching guide

Trains the distinction between ad hominem attacks and legitimate refutation. A fundamental rule of respectful debate.

Tap to return
7/8?

Could you state your argument in three sentences?

Tap to flip
7/8 Coaching guide

Forces synthesis. An argument that cannot be summarized is probably not well structured.

Tap to return
8/8?

What is the strongest part of the opposing argument?

Tap to flip
8/8 Coaching guide

The principle of charity: represent the best version of the opposing argument before refuting it.

Tap to return
1 / 8
Did you know...?

A Stanford University study found that students who practice structured argumentation improve not only their expression but also their reading comprehension by 20%, because learning to argue teaches reading with an analytical eye.

Kuhn, D. (2005) — Education for Thinking, Harvard University Press

Ideas for developing it

With debatesSecondary
  • Structured debates in the format: claim, evidence, refutation, closing
  • Reverse debate: defend the position opposite to your own
With textsPrimary and secondary
  • Identify thesis, arguments, and evidence in an opinion article
  • Write a letter to the editor arguing for or against a measure
With dilemmasSecondary
  • Analyze ethical dilemmas where there is no single 'correct' answer
  • Create an argument map with pros and cons of a decision
In groupsAll levels
  • Fishbowl: one group debates, the other observes and evaluates argument quality
  • Build a collective argument where each person adds one piece
With fallaciesSecondary
  • Fallacy hunt: identify logical errors in advertising and social media
  • Create your own examples of each type of fallacy